31 October 2009

Happy Halloween, All!

"We have had enough
of the vampires that live off of us

making us guilty,


that are making us pay someone else's dues,



and today we need, if I can end this poetically, only one stake together with garlic, to kill and destroy


all sorts of vampires."

- Slavoj Žižek, in
Žižek!

30 October 2009

Meatless Monday? What happened to meatless Tuesday, Wednesday, Thursday, Friday, Saturday, and Sunday?


AlterNet:
The meat industry is trying to portray the decision to emphasize vegetarian entreés in the Baltimore school cafeterias one day a week as a dangerous exercise in protein deprivation -- as if you can't get sufficient protein from non-meat sources. The Center For a Livable Future's Ralph Loglisci did a terrific job of setting the record straight with his post "Protein 101: Dispelling the Myth Surrounding Meatless Meals."

And ABC News reported last week that the Meatless Monday campaign in Baltimore's schools has, in fact, been a great success. Only a meathead -- or a meat-industry shill -- would brand this modest attempt to serve our kids healthier entreés and raise awareness about the environmental impact of our food choices as some kind of insidious conspiracy.
Modest is right. Is it even organic food? Is it mostly processed food?

Conservatives plan on making up for the loss of revenue to the beef industry by eating more meat on Monday. Glenn Beck whines, they obey.

Stupidest person on earth


I just finished watching the House Financial Services Committee on C-Span questioning Sheila Bair regarding financial regulation. Sheila Bair discussed depository institution writedowns in depth. When the adults finished talking, Michele Bachman got her turn and asked Bair about ACORN involvement with the Community Reinvestment Act and how was the FDIC looking into that. For those who aren't aware,the CRA was enacted in 1977 to address redlining of loans to qualified minorities and is often blamed by the unintelligent for problems arising from subprime loans.

Bachman also questioned Bernanke recently, asking if ACORN would be regulated under the Consumer Financial Protection Act.

Here is the frustrating and scary part.Not that she's a dumbass,not that people were stupid enough to knowingly vote for a dumbass. We are in an economic crisis as all-encompassing as the Great Depression. Fortunately there are enough stabilizers in effect as well as stimulus that we may make it out of this, but a positive outcome is hardly assured. An idiot like this should be laughed at and used as comic relief.

This is the scary part. I looked at YouTube to view her questioning of Bernanke. Stupid and embarrassing. I happened to glance at the comments below the video,and they consisted of people lauding Bachman. Teabagger mentality. Something so obviously stupid as equating ACORN with CDS's and TARP should be ridiculed by anyone with a functioning brain stem-and these people were instead impressed.

This is honestly and truly scary.

Tasini: "... during this economic crisis, companies are bucking up their bottom lines by dumping workers..."


Jonathan Tasini:
When we measure gross domestic product, we are essentially looking at the question of whether stuff is being made. It does not tell us what people are being paid to make stuff, nor does it tell us whether the money generated from those sales is flowing in a fair way to the people, and we also can't tell whether companies are making stuff with fewer workers.

So, the GDP can go up--at the same time that people are feeling a lot of pain and are afraid to spend money because they don't have a secure livelihood. The GDP does accurately tell us that wages are not going up, that one out of 5 people in America do not have decent paying work and, that during this economic crisis, companies are bucking up their bottom lines by dumping workers (translation: the corporate bottom lines are going to look better because "costs"--meaning, paying workers--are down.

That is not a good place to be. An economy is about people, not statistics.

The only way to get people back in the black is to go to the core of the problem: we need to reinflate peoples' paychecks, not with a temporary program but with a long-term drive that must include broad unionization.

The Real Palin

CBS:
Palin routinely referred to her baby, Trig, who suffers from Down syndrome, as "retarded."

"I was just in shock for the first time I heard it," Johnston recalled for Rodriguez. "And then she'd say it regularly. And I think she was joking, but it doesn't make it right."

Almost every day, I hear the armchair warmongers, pushing war on the radio...


They rarely talk about casualties. They talk about strategy.

When they are asked about casualties, they say that more American casualties mean more work to do, and that leaving will make all of those American deaths pointless. They say these things from their comfortable armchairs in their comfortable offices or studios. They can say these things to you and me because we keep them in business by listening to them.

Marshal Akhromeyev, 1986:
“About 99 percent of the battles and skirmishes that we fought in Afghanistan were won by our side. The problem is that the next morning there is the same situation as if there had been no battle. The terrorists are again in the village where they were — or we thought they were — destroyed a day or so before.”

"Free markets naturally tend towards unfree markets in which the choice for consumers is to take what is offered or go without."


Capitalism is all about the accumulation of capital and the creation of monopolies. "Free" markets are the enemy.

Ian Welsh:
I’m a big believer in free markets, myself. I’d love for more of them to exist. But it is basic economic theory (and something Adam Smith understood very well) that the first thing people do when they win the market is try and make sure there isn’t a market. The best profits are monopoly or oligopoly profits.

Free market mechanisms by themselves cannot ensure the continued existence of free markets. Government is needed, but so are the proper mores. When John Kenneth Galbraith, in the post war period, looked into why executives didn’t pay themselves a lot more (they could have) he came to the conclusion that it was essentially a cultural thing—managers wouldn’t tolerate it, it was against what they believed in.

Their ethics.

Likewise in 19th century America belonging to certain religious groups was a big plus for a merchant. People would go out of their way to do business with you, because they knew it was much more likely you wouldn’t cheat them or price gouge them, that you believed in a fair profit, but only a fair profit. Ethics.

Free market fundamentalisms in the US has done a great deal of damage by claiming the only ethic that matters is greed. The free market is not self regulating, the invisible hand does not always work to the benefit of society as a whole (as Adam Smith well knew), greed is not always good, and free markets naturally tend towards unfree markets in which the choice for consumers is to take what is offered or go without. (If you don’t believe me, take one of the “contracts” given to you by a big firm, and cross out the parts you disagree with, and write in your own wording. “Negotiate” with them. Let me know how it works out.)

Can Thom Friedman's Broken Watch Possibly Be Showing the Correct Time on Afghanistan?

Yeah. He's got it dead center on Afghanistan, but he's still using Friedman units on Iraq. Unreliable. I post him just because it feels good to pat him on the back. Because these days it's hard to find backs you want to pat as opposed to pounding.

29 October 2009

"What good is a union without the right to strike?"

A Union leaflet, via Rustbelt Radical:
We Can’t Accept This!

Ford workers made it clear that we did not want any more concessions. But the top leadership of the UAW did not listen to the membership. They didn’t do what we wanted them to do, so now WE are going to have to speak up for ourselves.

Here are the concessions that they want us to accept:

---No right to strike for the next 6 years for any wage and benefit
improvements. In other words, even to get back any of the raises, bonuses, COLA, or break time that we have lost, we couldn’t use the threat of a strike. An arbitrator would decide. And the arbitrator is allowed to keep our wages and benefits comparable to all other auto companies, including the transplants.

What good is a union without the right to strike?

---Freeze new hire wages for 6 years. New hires already will be working for half our pay, and now they want us to agree to hold them back even further.

If we do this, what will the new hires do in the future when they are voting on our wages, benefits and pensions???

---Consolidate and eliminate more skilled trades jobs.

They are going to try to tell us these are not concessions. What do you think?

[...]

Every day Ford is bragging about how well they are doing, but they want us to believe that Ford is hurting. Well, Ford workers are hurting for real. We can’t give up any more.

Every time we have given up concessions, they have come back for more. The only way to stop concessions is to say “No.” Once And For All.

Pal Joey

Adapted from Wikipedia entry for Pal Joey:

The setting is America; Joey Lieberman is a second-rate "Independent" Senator, a heel known for his warmongering ways, but charming and funny. When Joey meets George Bush, a naive President, he has stirrings of real feelings. However, that does not stop him from romancing the Democratic Party, in order to convince it to finance his dream, War with Iran. Soon Joey is involved with the Democrats, each using the other for their own somewhat selfish purposes. But Joey's feelings for Georgie and his Republican party are deep. Ultimately, the Democrats jealously demand that Joey help out on a Health Care Public Option. When Joey refuses ("Nobody owns Joey but Joey"), Democrats cave and agree not to punish Joey. Democrats agree to keep the trigger option open, and even offer to stay in Afghanistan forever, but Joey rejects the Democrats. As Joey is leaving with another triumph, the Democrats run after him, offering to go wherever he is headed. After winning a few more concessions and another chairmanship, Joey gives in and they walk away together, united.

Glenn Beck, Meet Samuel Beckett

"There is a little of everything, apparently, in nature, and freaks are common."
- Samuel Beckett
HARDCOVER NONFICTION

1. "Have a Little Faith: A True Story" by Mitch Albom (Hyperion)

2. "Arguing With Idiots: How to Stop Small Minds and Big Government" by Glenn Beck (Threshold Editions)

3. "Highest Duty: My Search for What Really Matters" by Chesley B. Sullenberg with Jeffrey Zaslow (William Morrow)

4. "True Compass: A Memoir" by Edward M. Kennedy (Twelve)

5. "Postsecret" by Frank Warren (Morrow)

6. "Moonwalk" by Michael Jackson (Harmony)

7. "Jim Cramer's Getting Back To Even" by James J. Cramer with Cliff Mason (Simon & Schuster)

8. "The Murder of King Tut" by James Patterson, Martin Dugard (Little, Brown)

9. "Crush It! Why NOW Is the Time to Cash In on Your Passion" by Gary Vaynerchuk (HarperStudio)

10. "Where Men Win Glory: The Odyssey of Pat Tillman" by Jon Krakauer (Doubleday)

11. "The Time of My Life" by Patrick Swayze, Lisa Niemi (Atria)

12. "Outliers: The Story of Success" by Malcolm Gladwell (Little, Brown and Company)

13. "The Greatest Show on Earth: The Evidence for Evolution" by Richard Dawkins (Free Press)

14. "America for Sale: Fighting the New World Order, Surviving a Global Depression, and Preserving USA Sovereignty" by Jerome R. Corsi (Threshold Editions)

15. "Guinness World Records 2010" by Guinness World Records (Guinness)
Is this the best we can do, putting this mush in our heads (Kennedy and Dawkins excepted)?

28 October 2009

The "good" war

N.Y. Times (via Glenn Greenwald):
Ahmed Wali Karzai, the brother of the Afghan president and a suspected player in the country’s booming illegal opium trade, gets regular payments from the Central Intelligence Agency, and has for much of the past eight years, according to current and former American officials.

The agency pays Mr. Karzai for a variety of services, including helping to recruit an Afghan paramilitary force that operates at the C.I.A.’s direction in and around the southern city of Kandahar, Mr. Karzai’s home.

Major civil rights victory! Thank you, Barack Obama.


HuffPo:
President Obama signed major civil rights legislation on Wednesday, making it a federal hate crime to assault people based on sexual orientation, gender and gender identity. The new measure expands the the scope of a 1968 law that applies to people attacked because of their race, religion or national origin. The U.S. Justice Department will have expanded authority to prosecute such crimes when local authorities don't.

The provision, called the Matthew Shepard & James Byrd Jr. Hate Crimes Prevention Act is attached to a defense authorization bill. It is named after Matthew Shepard, a gay college student tortured and killed in 1998, and James Byrd Jr., a black man who was chained to a pickup truck and dragged to his death the same year.

A lot of Republicans could care less about this stuff and never attempt legislation to fight hate crimes. In fact, they sometimes introduce legislation to stall the fight. They stand up for hate because they hate gays, and fear and resent minorities.

Judy Shepard had to wait more than 10 years to see this victory, thanks to Republicans and George W. Bush, thanks to talk radio.

Good Americans will remember.

Boo! Dude, where's my environment?









 






 

More proud than ever to be a Socialist

Clusterfux?



27 October 2009

America, Drone Terrorist

We test out our drone terrorism on Palestinian civilians,
because we can.

'Tis the Season!

 


HAPPY HALLOWEEN 

The most wonderful time of the year!

Harry Reid grows a pair.

THE PUBLIC OPTION LIVES!

BIG VICTORY FOR PROGRESSIVES


Harry Reid just announced that he'll include a public option (with a provision that allows individual states to opt out of it) in the version of the health care bill he brings to the floor of the senate. This is a huge (though still partial) victory for progressives. Over the weekend there was a flurry of reporting over whether Reid would include the opt-out provision, or the "trigger" provision favored by Olympia Snowe, which would not create a public option unless and until some time in the future when health insurance costs had not diminished.

The fact of the matter is, as David Sirota wrote here, the trigger is simply a way to kill the public option. Had Reid included it in the floor bill, progressives would have had to muster 60 votes to pass an amendment to strip the trigger out and replace it with the opt-out language. There's no way they would have been able to do that.

But with the opt-out public option included in the unamended floor-bill, opponents of the public option will now have to get 60 votes to pass their own amendment killing it, and they don't have those votes either. This means that the opt-out public option will almost certainly be in the final bill that comes up for a vote in the full senate. That's huge, since the house will also have a public option (an even stronger one, without the opt-out provision).

Reid is essentially calling the bluff of recalcitrant senators like Nelson, Lincoln and Landrieu, because the only way they can defeat the public option now is to join a Republican filibuster, something that I think Reid is gambling they won't do.

As I said on Maddow on Friday night, if you can't get members of your own party not to filibuster your single most important domestic policy priority, it's hard to understand why you even have a party to begin with.

Faux News: Surprised?

8 Reasons Fox Is Not a [I am speechless.] News Organization

PR for the GOP? Yes. Platform for right-wing hatemongers.  Yes.
But a news organization? Definitely not. 

Click here for full article


Even before Barack Obama was elected to the presidency, Rupert Murdoch had declared war on him via the personalities of Fox News Channel, a subsidiary of Murdoch's media conglomerate, News Corp.

Since Obama's election, the cable channel's hosts and paid analysts have launched a full frontal assault on the president, smearing his nominees, calling him a racist and suggesting that his administration was trying to persuade disabled veterans to off themselves.

[...]

  1. Glenn Beck, the community organizer—No other news operation in memory has ever hired its own community organizer, at least not one tasked with the mission of organizing paranoid people to march through the streets of the nation's capital with signs depicting the president of the United States as a mass murderer...Beck was also instrumental in turning out angry mobs to disrupt this summer's town hall meetings, where members of Congress attempted to discuss health care reform with their constituents.

  2. Fox's alliance with the corporate-funded astroturf group Americans for Prosperity —We've scratched our heads trying to come up with an analogous relationship between a cable news channel and a corporate-funded group that organizes fearful people to disrupt public meetings, but we came up empty.

    Americans For Prosperity, a group that received funding from Koch Industries, an oil-and-energy company and major polluter, also organized this summer's town hall disrupters. Although they kicked off their rabble-rousing campaign by galvanizing opposition to health care reform, their real target appears to be energy reform, especially the cap-and-trade provision that will make dirty industries pay a pretty penny to pollute.

  3. On-air fundraising for Republican PACs—Fox News personalities encourage viewers to contribute money to, and visit the Web sites of, specific Republican-affiliated political action committees. We can't find a single instance of either CNN or MSNBC doing anything of the kind for Democratic causes.

  4. Bill O'Reilly, stalker of those whose opinions he doesn't like—We exhausted all avenues of research trying to find a news show host at another cable news channel who pays his producer to stalk people whose opinions he or she doesn't like. Came up with bupkus. Nor could we find one who locked the media out of remarks she or he was delivering in acceptance of an award from a nonprofit group.

    At the annual conference of the religious-right political group, Family Research Council Action, O'Reilly received an award for his vilification of Dr. George Tiller. Tiller was an abortion provider who was gunned down in his church by a man who obviously took to heart references by O'Reilly and others, "Tiller the baby-killer."

  5. Sunday talk-show host who promotes Republican falsehoods—Once upon a time, Chris Wallace, son of the aforementioned Mike, was a real journalist, just like his dad. Then he joined the Fox team, as host of Fox News Sunday, which airs on the Fox's broadcast network.

    Wallace fell full-fledged into Fox's wing-nuttery when, in the heat of the town hall madness this summer, he promoted a Bush administration official's mischaracterization of a booklet recommended for patients in the Veterans Affairs medical system as a "death book" for veterans. The guest who made the allegations was an author whose book about end-of-life options had been rejected for distribution by the VA—a guy named Jim Towey, the former director of the Bush administration's office of faith-based initiatives.

  6. Fox News anchors, show hosts and pundits parrot GOP press releases, or just make up stuff—Promoting the notion that their organization is on some sort of Nixonian White House "enemies list," Fox News personalities first trotted out the "enemies list" theme in August, when they suggested that the White House, asking for Americans to send the administration any unsolicited e-mails they received that promoted false information about health care reform legislation, was actually compiling an "enemies list."

  7. Fox News hosts urge viewers to join a particular political group—During the run-up to the big right-wing 9-12/Tea Party march on Washington, Fox News entities and personalities repeatedly flogged viewers to join the Tea Party Express, a bus tour of anti-Obama activists.



  • Glenn Beck, deranged inventor of paranoid conspiracies—Here's a Beck exclusive you won't hear on any of the other cable news networks: OnStar, the GPS/emergency-alert system available in General Motors cars, is being indirectly funded by the auto-industry bailout so the government can spy on you.

    To be fair, Beck said this on his radio program, which is not a Fox News product, which is also where he compared the situation of Fox News to that of Jews during the Holocaust (with other news outlets acting as silent bystanders). In the same segment, he cast Obama as a "brutal dictator."

  • "Father's going to guarantee to build a better bomb if uncle sam will guarantee a paycheck every month"

    Found this song through Seeing Red Radio, "Grassroots Media with a Revolutionary Socialist perspective." Visit! This quotation is featured on their site:

    “At a time like this, scorching irony, not convincing argument, is needed. Oh had I the ability, and could reach the nation’s ear, I would, pour out a fiery stream of biting ridicule, blasting reproach, withering sarcasm, and stern rebuke. For it is not light that is needed, but fire; it is not the gentle shower, but thunder. We need the storm, the whirlwind, and the earthquake.”
    - Frederick Douglass



    This economy has been taken under siege
    by an industry that's been dictated militarily
    dependent on oil under foreign soil
    like a locomotive waiting to feel the water boil
    and our jobs in new technology are going over seas
    to bangalore for job security look where your
    nations spending all of your taxation
    ye ne sui par le beasuasie, we are the proletariate
    the house can't stand without the foundation
    even though you saw me on the street
    and we haven't changed a thing since 1944
    the business men in office make a killing with the war
    rosie you don't have to rivet anymore
    but your living wage is what you're fighting for
    father's going to guarantee to build a better bomb
    if uncle sam will guarantee a paycheck every month
    brother's in the infantry so he can go to college
    after his 4th and final tour
    and go ahead and call me a communist
    because i care for the welfare of my people
    i'm born your equal but don't you think its evil
    to own islands of property in a sea of starving people

    Thoughtless Murder

    This post needs few comments. This is one of the most disgusting stories I could imagine. So what are these murderers going to do? Buy more cows when milk prices go up again. These are animals that have known nothing but suffering their entire lives, and then they are slaugthered without forethought. 




    Low milk prices have
    dairy farmers killing cows




     DES MOINES, Iowa—After burning through $1 million in savings and seeing no end to their losses, dairy farmers Jake and Lori Slegers figured they didn't have much choice—they had to kill the cows.

    So one day last summer their sons tagged all 1,571 cows, loaded them onto trailers at their farm south of Fresno, Calif., and watched them rumble away to a slaughterhouse.

    Lori Slegers said her husband came into the house and broke down.

    "He said it was the hardest thing he ever had to do," she said. "Luckily, my boys could do it."

    Growing demand in developing nations drove up milk prices when times were good, and dairy farmers expanded their herds. But the global recession hurt exports and left farmers with too much milk on their hands. Milk processors cut the price they were willing to pay farmers, in many cases below what it cost to produce milk.

    In the past year, hundreds of farmers have come to the same conclusion as the Slegers: The only way to raise prices is to reduce the supply, and that means killing cows. In some cases, whole herds have been turned into hamburger. In others, farmers have kept their best producers and sent the rest to slaughter.

    The Slegers turned to an industry-run program called Cooperatives Working Together, or CWT, which pays farmers going out of business to kill — rather than sell — their cows and help remaining dairy operations by reducing the milk supply. Until this year, the 6-year-old program had paid for about 275,000 dairy cows to be slaughtered. This year alone, it has paid for more than 225,000 to be killed.

    In addition, individual farmers are sending cows to slaughter at a pace of about 55,000 per week, said Robert Cropp, a professor emeritus at the University of Wisconsin. At that rate, about 3 million cows could be killed in a year.

    Lifelong dairy farmers Keith Sammon, 55, and his brother, Mark, 53, decided to sell their herd to CWT last summer after considering the low milk prices, the cost of modernizing their operation and some personal health issues.

    Keith Sammon recalled the somber mood as he loaded the 80 cows onto livestock trailers one Sunday morning at their farm in Faribault, Minn.

    "As we milked the cows ... it was pretty quiet, but then my son came out with my granddaughter, who was 10 months old and she was just beginning to walk around. Just having her around made it easier," Keith Sammon said. "We would load the cows for a while and then go back and play with her for a while. It kind of took your mind off of it."

    The slaughter has helped some. Dairy farms pay CWT 10 cents for every hundred pounds of milk they produce. As the cows have been killed, the price processors pay for milk has gone up an average of 66 cents per hundred pounds of milk, said Scott Brown, an assistant research professor for dairy livestock at the University of Missouri-Columbia.

    Consumers haven't seen prices go up because processors still pay dairy farmers much less than the retail price, Cropp said. In fact, grocery store prices may still drop some because the milk supply remains much greater than the demand, he said.

    That's because even as thousands of cows are killed and many farmers call it quits, others are increasing their herds. In Wisconsin, the nation's second-largest dairy producer after California, the number of cows increased to about 1.25 million in August, up about 5,000 from the year before, according to state figures.

    Most of the growth was the result of state tax credits and grants approved a couple of years ago to help the industry modernize and expand. When those credits were approved, the industry was booming.

    Also, Wisconsin farmers haven't been hit as hard as those in western states such as California, where farmers must buy more of their feed. High feed, utility and other costs have compounded the losses created by the drop in milk prices.

    CWT spokesman Christopher Galen said most of the cows slaughtered in the program have come from western farms.

    For the Slegers, the future is cloudy. They are still farming corn, sorghum and winter oats this year but are looking at moving away and starting over. They're not sure what they would do.

    "We still don't know if it was the smartest move we ever made," Lori Slegers said. "One day, when the dairy business turns around, will we kick ourselves? We promised we wouldn't do that.

    "There is no big Other to rely on."

    Slavoj Žižek:
    There is only one correct answer to those Leftist intellectuals who desperately await the arrival of a new revolutionary agent capable of instigating the long-expected radical social transformation. It takes the form of the old Hopi saying, with a wonderful Hegelian twist from substance to subject: "We are the ones we have been waiting for." (This is a version of Gandhi's motto: "Be yourself the change you want to see in the world.") Waiting for someone else to do the job for us is a way of rationalizing our inactivity.

    26 October 2009

    Bush's Legacy


    Bush's Shocking Biblical Prophecy Emerges: God Wants to "Erase" Mid-East Enemies "Before a New Age Begins"

    Bush explained to French Pres. Chirac that the Biblical creatures Gog and Magog were at work in the Mid-East and must be defeated.

    How many of you caught this from May 2009? Are those cursed Neocons still in our government? Sure, just ask the Teabaggers, Anti-Choice fanatics, religious zealots, and those ilk who call themselves newcasters—Dittohead, Colterguest, Dobbigot, and Molted. They'll tell you everything you need to know, and you don't even have to think. Here's an Alternet post upon which I stumbled.

    Read the following if you dare. Then ask yourself, "Are President Obama and Vice President Biden really that bad. And will anyone ever have the nerve to tell Dick Cheney to keep his rancid comments to himself? At least Bush had the sense (and that doesn't happen often) to hide. The horror, the horror...



    The revelation this month in GQ Magazine that Donald Rumsfeld as Defense Secretary embellished top-secret wartime memos with quotations from the Bible prompts a question. Why did he believe he could influence President Bush by that means?

    The answer may lie in an alarming story about George Bush's Christian millenarian beliefs that has yet to come to light.

    In 2003 while lobbying leaders to put together the "Coalition of the Willing" [quotes mine], President Bush spoke to France's President Jacques Chirac. Bush wove a story about how the Biblical creatures Gog and Magog were at work in the Middle East and how they must be defeated.

    The story has now been confirmed by Chirac himself in a new book, published in France in March, by journalist Jean Claude Maurice. Chirac is said to have been stupefied and disturbed by Bush's invocation of Biblical prophesy to justify the war in Iraq and "wondered how someone could be so superficial and fanatical in their beliefs".

    In the same year he spoke to Chirac, Bush had reportedly said to the Palestinian foreign minister that he was on "a mission from God" in launching the invasions of Iraq and Afghanistan and was receiving commands from the Lord.

    In Genesis and Ezekiel, Gog and Magog are forces of the Apocalypse who are prophesied to come out of the north and destroy Israel unless stopped. The Book of Revelation took up the Old Testament prophesy:
    And when the thousand years are expired, Satan shall be loosed out of his prison, And shall go out to deceive the nations which are in the four quarters of the earth, Gog and Magog, to gather them together to battle and fire came down from God out of heaven, and devoured them.
    Bush believed the time had now come for that battle, telling Chirac:
    This confrontation is willed by God, who wants to use this conflict to erase his people's enemies before a New Age begins".
    he story of the conversation emerged only because the Elyse Palace, baffled by Bush's words, sought advice from Thomas Romer, a professor of theology at the University of Lausanne. Four years later, Romer gave an account in the September 2007 issue of the university's review, Allez savoir. The article apparently went unnoticed, although it was referred to in a French newspaper.

    There can be little doubt now that President Bush's reason for launching the war in Iraq was, for him, fundamentally religious. He was driven by his belief that the attack on Saddam's Iraq was the fulfillment of a Biblical prophesy in which he had been chosen to serve as the instrument of the Lord.

    Many thousands of Americans and Iraqis have died in the campaign to defeat Gog and Magog. That the US President saw himself as the vehicle of God whose duty was to prevent the Apocalypse can only inflame suspicions across the Middle East that the United States is on a crusade against Islam.

    There is a curious coda to this story. While a senior at Yale University George W. Bush was a member of the exclusive and secretive Skull & Bones society. His father, George H.W. Bush had also been a "Bonesman", as indeed had his father. Skull & Bones' initiates are assigned or take on nicknames. And what was George Bush Senior's nickname? "Magog."



    LET'S PLAY "NAME THE BUSH II MENTAL DISORDER"

    Bushit insisted on more than one occasion that he was on a "mission from God." You decide. I America was able to withstand eight years of the previous administration, I can at least have some hope that we can make this country better if we speak out.

    Schizophrenia? A mental disorder that makes it difficult to tell the difference between real and unreal experiences, to think logically, to have normal emotional responses, and to behave normally in social situations.
    • Child-like (regressive) behavior
    • Delusions
    • Hallucinations
    • Not understandable (incoherence)
    • False beliefs or thoughts that have nothing to do with reality (delusions)
    • Hearing, seeing, or feeling things that are not there (hallucinations)

    OR

    Psychosis a loss of contact with reality, usually including false ideas about what is taking place or who one is (delusions) and seeing or hearing things that aren't there (hallucinations).
    • Abnormal displays of emotion
    • Confusion
    • Depression and sometimes suicidal thoughts
    • Disorganized thought and speech
    • Extreme excitement (mania)
    • False beliefs (delusions)
    • Loss of touch with reality
    • Mistaken perceptions (illusions)
    • Seeing, hearing, feeling, or perceiving things that are not there (hallucinations)
    • Unfounded fear/suspicion

    Too Big to Fail, Out with the Failure


    "Someone else might walk out of here every day depressed, but I don't walk out of here depressed. I will sit down in my Jacuzzi tonight. I'm going to lay back with a stogie."
    - Governor Schwarzenegger

    "A vegetarian diet is better."

    “Meat is a wasteful use of water and creates a lot of greenhouse gases. It puts enormous pressure on the world’s resources. A vegetarian diet is better.”
    - Lord Stern of Brentford

    "Meat uses up a lot of resources and a vegetarian diet consumes a lot less land and water. One of the best things you can do about climate change is reduce the amount of meat in your diet."
    - Su Taylor

    19.6%

    U-6 = total unemployed, plus all marginally attached workers, plus total employed part time for economic reasons, as a percent of the civilian labor force plus all marginally attached workers.

    For California, it's 19.6% (4th qtr. 2008-3rd qtr. 2009 avg.).

    In 2007, it was 9.9%
    In 2006, it was 9.1%
    In 2005, it was 9.7%

    "All lanes are jammed on the superhighway to Clowntown, U.S.A."


    Ebullient Skepticism:
    Recently, in the latest in a series of setbacks and self-inflicted wounds, the national identity of the United States sustained another humiliating blow when General Motors was driven into a ditch, declared totaled, and then stripped and sold for spare parts.

    This event throws a rod into the smoking engine block of the nation’s dream machine: The automobiles manufactured in Detroit were once symbols of American power, freedom of mobility, even sexual allure.

    But the world has sped ahead, leaving the US wheezing dust in its wake: The era of high horsepower and American ascendancy, with its glinting chrome conceit and reinforced steel illusions of unassailable power, now sits upon concrete blocks rusting in the automobile graveyard of history.

    At present, and for many years now, the American automobile culture has meant little more than feckless commuters stalled in traffic, alternatively sullen and seething in their powerlessness.

    Yet, this is not the time to throw a populist pity party: The people of the nation face a future circumscribed by their own lack of self-awareness and their refusal of civic engagement. Year after year, they have displayed avidity for little more than the rigged, roadside attractions of the corporate carnival; hence, traffic is heavy on this lost highway, all lanes are jammed on the superhighway to Clowntown, U.S.A.

    Seemingly, the nation’s hopes are only being kept flickering by caffeine, antidepressants and the naive belief that they — accepting, as Americans have, since birth, the narcissistic mythos of the consumer state — are a special breed whose God-kissed destiny would forever fall outside the failures and contretemps of earthly life.

    Therefore, Americans cling to the core conviction that there should not be any consequences for their own oceanic apathy, child-like credulity and small-time cupidity in regard to their relationship to the elitist power brokers whose financial chicanery and political scheming determined their hapless fate.

    Both prole and plutocrat set the wheel in motion, and both wait for some kind of deux ex machina, whereby Fortuna will smile once again on the hobbled nation, and restore it and all its special children to their rightful place — up above the world of regret, reflection, and amends — back upon their highchairs of infantile entitlement.

    25 October 2009

    I am not a Nook person, I am not a Kindle person, I am not a Luddite


    I love books. I love to hold them, look at them, open them, read them. Book readers, for me, will never be more than a temporary substitute for the real thing.

    Would I, if stuck on a desert island, and given the choice between having five real books (of my choice) and 1,500 electronic books (of my choice), pick the electronic reader?*

    I'm not sure I would! Take the poll over on the right.

    *Also comes with an endless supply of batteries.

    "...a gnawing feeling that something about government has gone horribly wrong."

    Via Anarchy in Your Head:
    The System Is Violent

    Not all systems are. A group of friends voting on where to eat is clearly not violent as one can always opt out and go elsewhere. But that's not the nature of a monopolistic political process. The decision chosen by the winners gets violently imposed on everyone, even those who didn't participate. Sometimes the decisions imposed are quite divisive, like taking your money under threat of imprisonment and using it to promote something you find morally repulsive. These controversial subjects addressed in a sweeping manner for all subjects create strife in pluralistic communities. In short, violence begets violence.

    Why Hasn't Voting Helped?

    Voting allows everyone to absolve themselves of responsibility. Individuals sacrifice or ignore their personal judgment for the process. Politicians don't take responsibility because they claim to be carrying out the will of the voters. Enforcers within the system, like soldiers and police, say they're just following orders. Voters have been convinced their only method of expressing themselves or affecting change is to vote, so of course they just vote for “the lesser evil” from extremely limited choices. They don't feel responsible for what their candidate ultimately does. Why would they under such limited options? So then how can politicians claim they're carrying out the will of the people in the first place? It's a vicious cycle of buck-passing.

    Voting is a way of saying, “I want someone else to solve my problems for me.” Ultimately, no one takes responsibility for the harmful results of the system. We all have our notions of what those particularly horrible failures of government are, and though it varies from person to person, we almost consistently have a gnawing feeling that something about government has gone horribly wrong. Our values are different and until we face that reality, we will keep taking the wrong approach to addressing society's problems. Meanwhile, the bureaucracy becomes a wasteful and dangerously erratic machine because various powerful special interests are all pulling it in different directions and making your voice all the more insignificant.

    23 October 2009

    You've heard of Republicans for Rape, meet the Democrat for Rape

    HuffPo:

    An amendment that would prevent the government from working with contractors who denied victims of assault the right to bring their case to court is in danger of being watered down or stripped entirely from a larger defense appropriations bill.

    Multiple sources have told the Huffington Post that Sen. Dan Inouye, a longtime Democrat from Hawaii, is considering removing or altering the provision, which was offered by Sen. Al Franken (D-Minn.) and passed by the Senate several weeks ago.

    Denied health insurance, an instant candidate for life insurance


    Via Oliver Willis:
    In 2003, William Koehler of Pittsburgh, Pa. lost his job as an electronics technician. He lost his health insurance, too, but he’d been lucky enough to have the defibrillator battery in his heart changed just the previous year. No insurer would cover him except for one company which refused to cover anything related to his arrhythmia, says his sister.

    He survived as long as his battery did, dying on March 7, 2009 at 57. His sister, Georgeanne Koehler, has become an activist, telling the story about how her brother died to anyone who will listen.

    "I blame insurance companies, I blame his doctor, and I blame politicians," Koehler said to a gaggle or reporters asking about her brother's death after the protest.
    The blood on their hands can't be washed off by reform. The politicians have stalled health care reform for decades and directly caused innumerable deaths by their failure to act on our behalf. The additional deaths caused by passage of weak reform with be a permanent stain on this Congress's reputation.

    "Our Constitution is first and foremost a property document protecting their money."

    Joe Bageant:
    Our Constitution is first and foremost a property document protecting their money. In actual practice, our constitutional civil liberties, inspiring as they are in concept to people around the world, are mainly side action to make the institutionalization of the owning class more palatable. You can argue that may not have been the intent of the slave owning, rent collecting, upper class founding fathers. But you would be full of shit. We can keep on pretending to be independent, free to keep on living in those houses on which we still owe $300,000. But they own and control the money that comes through our hands. And they plan to keep on owning it and charging us to use it.

    Long live the Revolution! Anarchy Forever! C.I.A. Sucks!


    Just making sure we get swept up in the C.I.A.'s blog dragnet.

    IndyBay:
    Thursday, October 22, 2009 :Wired magazine has revealed the investment arm of the Central Intelligence Agency has invested in a software firm called Visible Technologies that specializes in monitoring social media sites, including blogs, Flickr, YouTube, Twitter and Amazon. Wired reporter Noah Shachtman writes, “America’s spy agencies want to read your blog posts, keep track of your Twitter updates -- even check out your book reviews on Amazon.”

    Everyone wave!

    Get ready for Obama's "whole hog" Afghanistan plan

    N.Y. Times:
    Senior NATO officials made clear that additional commitments should go beyond combat forces to include trainers for the Afghan army and police force, as well as civilians to help rebuild the economy and restore confidence in the government.

    “What we need is a much broader strategy, which stabilizes the whole of Afghan society, and this is the essence in the recommendations presented by General McChrystal,” said Mr. Rasmussen, the alliance secretary general. “This won’t happen just because of a good plan. It will also need resources — people and money.”
    Need a job? Go nation build for Barack.

    If you haven't jumped Ship Obama, now is the time

    TPM:
    Multiple sources tell TPMDC that Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid is very close to rounding up 60 members in support of a public option with an opt out clause, and are continuing to push skeptical members. But they also say that the White House is pushing back against the idea, in a bid to retain the support of Sen. Olympia Snowe (R-ME).

    [...]

    This new development, which casts the White House as an opponent of all but the most watered down form of public option, is likely to yield backlash from progressives, especially those in the House who have been pushing for a more maximal version of reform.

    Obama seals Spotted Seal's fate


    From an email I received yesterday from the Center for Biological Diversity:
    Thanks to an unsound Obama administration decision last Thursday, the Arctic's imperiled spotted seal could soon slip into oblivion along with its melting sea-ice habitat. In response to a Center for Biological Diversity petition and lawsuit, the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration decided not to protect the seal under the Endangered Species Act -- even though the beautiful mammal could lose 40 percent of its main icy winter habitat to warming by 2050. In addition to loss of sea ice, spotted seals are threatened by increased oil and gas drilling: The Obama administration is now pondering proceeding on a Bush-era plan to expand offshore oil and gas development in spotted seal habitat.
    Rush Limbaugh wants to own a football team. I want the Spotted Seal to survive and thrive.

    22 October 2009

    Can't lose something you never had

    "Stories that we are telling ourselves about ourselves, these stories are not the truth. They are lies. The truth is what we do."
    - Slavoj Žižek

    Cheney:
    For all that we’ve lost in this conflict, the United States has never lost its moral bearings – and least of all can that be said of our armed forces and intelligence personnel.
    Got it? The United States has never lost its moral bearings. We're perfect. The military doesn't massacre innocent civilians unless it's absolutely necessary. We don't torture, we enhance interrogate. Morally.

    Cheney will repeat this over and over because he's one of those people who thinks saying something makes it so. He's used to bossing people around. He'll be bullying the rest of us for the rest of his days into believing that he never did a single thing wrong in his career as a public servant tyrant.

    LMAO: AG Brown Retort at CNBC: "...if you don’t want the interview, shut it off."


    A post to remind California residents to support, volunteer and vote for

    BROWN IN 2010

    From a  Jerry Brown campaign email: Yesterday I filed a $200 Million dollar fraud action against State Street Bank for ripping off California's pension funds. In another example of how Wall Street elites poo poo financial abuse in their own backyard, CNBC sneered at this important effort to recover money stolen from California retirees.

    The CNBC clip appears at the Calbuzz clip below—Brown doesn't suffer fools gladly—which is why California needs him as governor again.mdash;to clean up Ah-nold's mismanagement of California resources.

    A reminder that this fraud occurred under Ah-nold's watch. I wonder how much our faux governor got from State Street. Maybe he'll be Brown's next target.



    From Cal Buzz

    It’s not every day you see a state attorney general hold a blank piece of white paper in front of his face during a nationally televised interview and tell the reporters they can cut off the interview if they don’t want to cover the story. But then again, Jerry Brown isn’t like most attorneys general, let alone most human beings.

    Brown was asked to go on CNBC Tuesday to talk about the $200 million fraud case ($56 million plus penalties) his Department of Justice had just filed against State Street Bank, and the talking heads and headettes on the business news network got more than they bargained for.

    In addition to giving State Street an opportunity to respond to the charges even before the charges were aired, the network embarrassed itself by trying to bitch-slap Brown. When Michelle Caruso-Cabrera put on a snarky, cynical, world-weary reporter act and accused Crusty of flogging the case for political gain, Brown didn’t hesitate a second, breaking the fourth wall and refusing to be caught by the convention of a live national interview.

    “OK, first of all, if you don’t want the interview, shut it off,” Brown said, “It was your idea, so that’s pretty silly. You feed off this just like any other media outlet.” Moreover, he added&mdashknocking Ms, Caruso-Cabrera back on her heels—“It’s kind of symptomatic of the insensitivity and the arrogance of the Eastern financial elite that you would say, ‘Oh, $56 million, why don’t you suck it up and forget it?’”

    Then, when nitwit Dennis Kneale—who appeared to be making snide asides while Brown was talking—asked Brown if the whistle-blower who brought the case to the AG’s office was paid to bring it, Brown took no prisoners: “What are you guys doing? Are you pimping for the defendant in this case? I can’t believe it.”

    This is what makes Jerry Brown one of the most compelling and interesting political figures in the country. He is totally unafraid to break through the bounds of convention, and won’t let himself get caught in a double bind. You gotta love this guy.



    Office of the [California] Attorney General
    20 October 2009


    SACRAMENTO—Seeking to recover more than $200 million in illegal overcharges and penalties, Attorney General Edmund G. Brown Jr. today announced that he has filed suit against State Street Bank and Trust—one of the world's leading providers of financial services to institutional investors—for committing "unconscionable fraud" against California's two largest pension funds—CalPERS and CalSTRS, [These entities manage the pension funds of California State Employees, University of California, and California State University.]

    The suit, which was unsealed today by a Sacramento Superior Court judge, contends that Boston-based State Street illegally overcharged CalPERS and CalSTRS for the costs of executing foreign currency trades since 2001.

    "Over a period of eight years, State Street bankers committed unconscionable fraud by misappropriating millions of dollars that rightfully belonged to California's public pension funds," Brown said. "This is just the latest example of how clever financial traders violate laws and rip off the public trust."

    The case was originally filed under seal by whistleblowers—"Associates Against FX Insider Trading," who alleged that State Street added a secret and substantial mark-up to the price of interbank foreign currency trades. The interbank rate is the price at which major banks buy and sell foreign currency.

    Subsequently, Brown launched an independent investigation into the allegations. Brown's investigation revealed that State Street was indeed overcharging the two funds.

    Despite being contractually obligated to charge the interbank rate at the precise time of the trade, State Street consistently charged at or near the highest rate of the day, even if the interbank rate was lower at the time of trade.

    Additionally, State Street concealed the fraud by deliberately failing to include time stamp data in its reports, so that the pension funds could not determine the true execution costs by verifying when State Street actually executed the trades. Commenting on this deception, one State Street senior vice president said to another executive that "...if providing execution costs will give [CalPERS] any insight into how much we make off of FX transactions, I will be shocked if [State Street] or anyone would agree to reveal the information."

    Brown's office estimates that the pension funds were overcharged by more than $56.6 million over eight years. The lawsuit asks for relief in the amount of triple California's damages, civil penalties of $10,000 for each false claim; and recovery of costs, attorneys' fees and expenses. It is estimated that damages and penalties could exceed more than $200 million.

    Under California's False Claims Act, anyone who has previously undisclosed information about a fraud, overcharge, or other false claim against the state, can file a sealed lawsuit on behalf of California to recover the losses. They must notify the Attorney General as well.

    Such a case is called a qui tam case. If there is a monetary recovery, the law provides that the whistleblower [the] qui tam plaintiff" receives a share of the amount recovered if the requirements of the statute are met.

    "Extraordinary" is not the right word

    N.Y. Times:
    In an extraordinary bid to lure traditionalist Anglicans en masse, the Vatican said Tuesday that it would make it easier for Anglicans uncomfortable with their church’s acceptance of female priests and openly gay bishops to join the Roman Catholic Church while retaining many of their traditions.
    If you are looking for a haven for your anti-gay bigotry, female-gender prejudice, and authoritarian-loving mindset, you know exactly where you belong.

    Freeze time in the feudal era, join Pope Benedict's Catholic Church.

    21 October 2009

    "The Capitalist Class spends a great deal of money trying to get you to buy shit that you don't need."

    More great video from brendanmcooney.


    "We have to be taught to desire." - Slavoj Žižek

    Nobel Peace Prize Winner Wins Battle to Hide Evidence of Torture

    Peace can descend on the land now that torture photos have been permanently suppressed.

    Mother Jones:
    President Obama has won his fight to ensure that the Defense Department can conceal evidence of its employees' wrongdoing. On Thursday, the House passed a measure allowing the DoD to withhold essentially any photos of detainee abuse that it doesn't want the public to see. The move is a huge defeat for the ACLU, which has been fighting a years-long legal battle to obtain such photos under the Freedom of Information Act. But now an amendment sponsored by Sen. Joe Lieberman (I-Conn.), makes all that moot and slashes a huge hole in FOIA. Rep. Louise Slaughter (D-N.Y.) was a key figure in stopping Lieberman's photo suppression bill the first time around. In a floor speech Thursday, she explained that this time, the provision was slipped into the Homeland Security spending bill during the conference between House and Senate negotiators—"apparently under direct orders from the Administration."

    Inequality is the Path to Revolution

    We have to tolerate the inequality as a way to achieve greater prosperity and opportunity for all.”
    - Brian Griffiths, ex-adviser to Margaret Thatcher
    This stupid idiot from Goldman Sachs thinks inequality is something people will tolerate forever, because somehow it's good for them in the end. The only thing massive inequality ever breeds is revolution.

    Banks are in a simple business: lending money. They have managed to turn it into an overly-complicated racket that screws people over in countless little ways so that a bunch of assholes can become enormously rich. They marry a willingness to fuck people over for profit with arrogant assumptions about what is good for us, the "little" people.

    Fortunately, the people's tolerance for this kind of treatment is not infinite.

    "The half that was on top cared little for the struggles, and less for the fate, of those who were underneath, so long as it was able to hold them there and keep its own seat."
    - Jacob Riis

    Hearts and Minds My Ass

    Battle for Hearts and Minds Trailer from Danfung Dennis on Vimeo.

    (CNN) -- The top U.S. commander in Afghanistan wants more troops and a new strategy -- but most importantly, he wants to win the battle for the hearts and the minds of the people in the war-torn country.
    Think about it. We talk about using the military, a violent group of people, some of whom are pathologically violent and just plain stupid, a group completely unskilled in diplomacy, to win the "hearts and minds" of the people of the countries we invade.

    Is such a thing even possible? It's not even remotely possible. Very few hearts or minds will ever be won over by a bunch of testosterone-filled young men bred to violence by our military machine, and we are using that idiotic mantra "hearts and minds" an an excuse to stay wherever we want for as long as we want.

    This is from a piece by Chris Lombardi, who "recounts the clutch of soldiers who have refused to serve or repented their service in every American war since the War of 1812":
    A sweet-faced young blond named Jason Lemieux described “firefights in which the rules of engagement were routinely ignored” because of “unit loyalty and camaraderie” combined with “an emphasis on minimizing short-term casualties,” he said. Troops were authorized “on numerous occasions to shoot any Iraqi that seems suspicious,” and were told that “the command will take care of you.”

    Lemieux said when he submitted incident reports showing “use of excessive force,” commands either downplayed them or, in one case, actually altered the numbers. In Tal Afar, now famous as one of President Bush’s great Army successes, “more innocent civilians were injured and killed by Americans than by the enemy,” said Army scout Scott Ewing, his face blank. Ewing described arriving at homes in Tal Afar that had just been blasted by Apache helicopters: “One little boy pointed to his chest,” he said softly. “We tried to bandage their wounds.”

    Ewing also showed a slide of a trashed home from a day when “thousands of soldiers were ordered to search aggressively” for weapons. Following orders, the troops kicked down doors, smashed computers, and ripped bed sheets. Overall, said Ewing, “trashing people’s homes did not win us friends in Tal Afar.”

    James Emanuel Gilligan spoke of routine abuse of detainees near the Syrian border: “punching, kicking, anything we wanted.” When one was released, he said, “we would drive then to the middle of the desert,” far from the detainee’s home, and drop him off. It was also “standard procedure to drive over the corpses” of Iraqi dead, rendering them indistinguishable. Echoing Goldsmith, Gilligan added: “Many including myself did not have any intent of helping the Iraqis.”

    Part of what made this all possible, the vets said, was racism. A previous generation’s “gook” had become “hajji,” and thus other and expendable. Geoffrey Millard showed a slide of a sedan blasted into fragments at a checkpoint; his commander, he said, had brushed it off, saying: “If these fucking hajjis learned to drive, that wouldn’t happen.”

    20 October 2009

    Lie, Cheat, and Steal...

    ...yet another excellent post from HuffPo



    Is man inherently evil? [Jonathan Swift would agree.] Maybe that's too big a question.

    Are members of the securities industry inherently evil? Will they do or say absolutely anything to get their hands on your money?

    Obviously, it would be unfair to make such a blanket characterization, but sometimes you really have to wonder.

    Consider these items:




    Item #1: A study by two finance professors estimated that 10% of the returns of hedge funds reported to a standard database were "distorted." The authors concluded that "[T]his suggests that misreporting returns is a widespread phenomenon."

    Translation: The practice of lying about hedge fund returns to make them appear more attractive than they are is a common practice.

    Item #2: Another study concludes the hedge fund industry "is vulnerable to entry by managers who have no particular skill, but whose lack of skill is difficult to detect based solely on their track records. In other words, the hedge fund industry has a potential lemons problem."

    Translation: A con artist can easily set up a hedge fund, make it look like he is adding "alpha," reap the rewards of huge fees and live happily ever after when the fund blows up.

    Item #3: A third study found that "incomplete and inaccurate disclosure of important information is not uncommon among a sample of funds selected for research by clients of a major due diligence firm."

    Translation: Lies, lies and more lies. [...and statistics?]

    Item #4: Billionaire Raj Rajaratnam and others were arrested on October 16, 2009 and charged with using inside information that permitted the $7 billion hedge fund at Galleon Group in which he was a partner to reap $12.7 million in profits. These charges are allegations only and have yet to be proven at trial.

    Translation: This item is the least surprising. The only way to get an edge in an efficient market is to illegally use inside information.

    The bottom line transcends "buyer beware" [caveat emptor], This is an industry where the end justifies the means. The only expertise they have is the ability to transfer your wealth to their pocket.

    Not every sheep must be shorn. You should be the exception.

    Read more at Huff Po

    "Anyone who accepts Uncle Sam's promises at their face value will find that they must be paid for in sweat and blood."


    Alan Maass, November 2, 2001:
    The U.S. government is largely controlled by a small elite--made up of corporate chiefs, leaders of mainstream political parties, generals and so on. Their interests, both at home and abroad, lie in protecting and increasing their own power and wealth.

    Of course, America's rulers couldn't get anyone to support a war if they put it this bluntly. So they appeal to ideals that ordinary people believe in.

    "When and where has there been a war…in which each and every belligerent party did not with a heavy heart draw the sword from its sheath for the single and sole purpose of defending its Fatherland and its own righteous cause from the shameful attacks of the enemy?" asked Polish revolutionary Rosa Luxemburg. "This legend is as inextricably a part of the game of war as powder and lead."

    The U.S. government wants to preserve its political and economic domination of the globe. And it always looks for the tools that are right for the job. So when the U.S. wanted to oppose the former USSR's invasion of Afghanistan, it didn't support democratic organizations, but the most conservative elements of the Islamist movement.

    Likewise today, the U.S. isn't supporting groups like the Revolutionary Association of the Women of Afghanistan--which has opposed both the ex-USSR's occupation and the tyranny of the hard-line Islamists--but the bickering warlords of the Northern Alliance, who are cut from the same cloth as the Taliban.

    [...]

    Socialists are accused of being "knee-jerk" opponents of U.S. imperialist adventures. We are--because we believe that the U.S. government will never act except in the interests of injustice, tyranny and greed.

    We believe that it's up to the people of Afghanistan, the Middle East and Southwest Asia to settle accounts with local rulers and determine their own fates--free from the meddling of the "great powers."

    As the American socialist and journalist John Reed put it: "Uncle Sam never gives anybody something for nothing. He comes along with a sack stuffed with hay in one hand and a whip in the other. Anyone who accepts Uncle Sam's promises at their face value will find that they must be paid for in sweat and blood."
    Visit RAWA and RAWA News.
    The US "War on terrorism" removed the Taliban regime in October 2001, but it has not removed religious fundamentalism which is the main cause of all our miseries. In fact, by reinstalling the warlords in power in Afghanistan, the US administration is replacing one fundamentalist regime with another. The US government and Mr.Karzai mostly rely on Northern Alliance criminal leaders who are as brutal and misogynist as the Taliban. [source]

    Afghanistan Mon Amour

    "Afghan people are facing a 9/11 everyday."
    - Malalai Joya

    October 5, 2009:
    MR. GIBBS:
    No. In fact, the President was — the President was exceedingly clear... no part of the conversation involved was leaving Afghanistan.
    NOW:
    NOW: "What would you like Americans to know about your country?"

    Joya: "I want them to know that Afghan people have been victims of the U.S. government's wrong policies in the past three decades following the Cold War. They should know that Afghanistan is not "liberated" at all as trumpeted by the Western media. They should know that their government is playing a chess game with our country and is not interested in its stability. They should know that worse enemies of the Afghan people, those who brought Osama Bin Laden to Afghanistan and slaughtered our people and committed unbelievable crimes against its unfortunate women, are now in power and backed by the U.S. government. They should know that Afghan people are facing a 9/11 everyday. They should know that under the U.S. occupation, Afghanistan has become the world's number one opium producer and a large part of it is smuggled to the U.S. Finally they should know that, like all human beings Afghan people love democracy and freedom and dream of a prosperous life. While we hate the war-mongering and criminal-fostering policies of the U.S. government, we feel, acknowledge and thank the sympathies and support of the U.S. people and learn from their humanism and dedication."

    "She is banished from this assembly and cannot return. ... Guards, throw her out."

    For speaking the truth in a man's world, Malalai Joya was banished from the Loya Jirga.


    "Democracy can't be donated to a nation through occupation, cluster bombs and air raids."
    - Malalai Joya

    Code Pink Falters

    Very sad. The Scott Horton interview below can be heard at Antiwar.com here.

    SFGate:
    As throngs of protesters from across the political spectrum churned outside President Obama's San Francisco fundraiser Thursday, one of San Francisco's best-known anti-war activists, Code Pink co-founder Medea Benjamin, was in Washington having just returned from a week in Afghanistan.

    [...]

    "What I was left feeling is that I don't know what would be a realistic timeline without first coming up with the exit plan," she said. Before she went there, "I felt that troops should start coming home now."

    "My position hasn't been changed. But I feel now I have a better understanding from the many people we spoke to that an exit strategy has to have several components to it. The sooner there is a commitment to come home, the faster that peace talks can happen."

    She feels Obama has been backed into a "disastrous" political corner now that McChrystal's proposal for a troop increase is public.

    "Now it pushes him into a corner of being labeled as not supporting the commanders on the ground," she said, "which is a very vulnerable position for him to be in."
    Anti-war Radio:
    Benjamin: ... If you say to people, "Do you want 40,000 more troops, or would you like that money to go to economic development, healthcare, education?" They almost always said the latter. So people told us that war was not the answer. That after eight years of U.S. presence and billions of dollars being thrown into this conflict that the lives of people, especially those living outside of Kabul have virtually stayed the same, and that even women who know that the Taliban has had a very retrograde position in terms of women’s rights, even they told us that, look, the majority of Taliban are just poor villagers who don’t have another way to earn a living. We’ve got to reintegrate them into society, we’ve got to have peace talks and we’ve got to find ways other than through guns and bombs that we solve this conflict.

    Horton: Well now there is a real problem here in a sense of, well, I’ll take another example from history, not too far in the past, but where, and this is the "catastrophe in waiting," the worst case scenario, is when the Belgians pulled out of Rwanda and left a minority group that they and propped up in power all along high and dry, and the majority came and got their revenge, and it was an absolute bloody mess, and of course everybody, especially the Right wing warmongers like to say that, you know, we can’t have a repeat of Vietnam where the people that we were there to help end up being left high and dry to be slaughtered by the bad guys and that kind of thing. But I guess my question is, whether anybody really thinks that at some point the people that we are supporting, whether outright militarily with bombings from the sky or with reconstruction money or however you phrase it; training up their troops or whatever. Aren’t we doing nothing but put off that same kind of situation? I mean ultimately whoever goes along with the Americans in Afghanistan is never going to be the majority of the country, right? Not even by a long shot.
     
    Er du fra Skandinavia? Behage skrive en bemerkning å meg og si Hei! Tusen takk!